The impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement on U.S. employment has been debated since the creation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Canada and Mexico in 1994. PROPONENTs of NAFTA believe that, in the end, more jobs have been created in the United States. Opponents see the agreements as expensive work in well-paid American jobs. The documentation requirement was imposed to make it clear that the proposed activity is incidental or related to the sale of devices or machinery or computer software. The other parties to the agreement meet the same requirements. Since NAFTA is a facilitation agreement, the applicant should be given every opportunity to prove that the criteria for the admission of business travellers are met and to provide missing documents by other means, for example. B for example by fax. While NAFTA provides only for after-sales situations, the general R187 rule for business travellers, under which this section of NAFTA is implemented, allows individuals to participate in sales and leasing contracts.
The initial guarantee or service contract may be renewed, provided that the sale contract or the original warranty or service contract includes a provision for renewal. The after-sales service therefore continues to be contractually bound in connection with the sale of equipment or machinery or computer software. Equipment or machinery leased or leased by a company outside of Canada is not covered by the provision of customer services. For computer software, “Buy” contains a licensing agreement. Supporters reject the claim that the free trade agreement destroys the manufacturing industry and leads to the expulsion of workers from the industry. The rate of job losses due to plant closures, a typical argument against NAFTA, showed a slight deviation from previous periods.  U.S. industrial production, which accounts for 78% of manufacturing, also increased by 49% between 1993 and 2005. In the period prior to NAFTA from 1982 to 1993, the increase was only 28%.  According to NAM, the National Association of Manufacturers, NAFTA is responsible for only 10% of the trade deficit in industrial products, which opponents criticize for the tightening of the agreement.
 Export growth to Canada and Mexico accounted for a significant share of total U.S. exports.  However, the percentage of growth in exports to Canada and Mexico remained well below the growth in exports to the rest of the world.  According to the Economic Policy Institute, the increase in the trade deficit with Mexico alone since nafta led to a net decline of 682,900 U.S. jobs through 2010.  In a 2003 paper published by the Economic Policy Institute, it was found that President George W.